(iii) The contractor or subcontractor asserting the restriction shall be informed of such reproduction, disclosure, disclosure or use. The confidentiality agreement does not provide for additional conditions, unless the parties to the confidentiality agreement mutually agree; and DoD Response: with regard to the legal adequacy and effect of 252.227-7025, this clause clearly establishes a legally sufficient and binding obligation for the recipient of the information, which expressly includes all the restrictions provided for in the legal language and expressly confirms that the holder of the protected information is a third party beneficiary of these obligations, and therefore a direct means against the recipient of the protected information. for any breach of these obligations. In addition, the clause provided for in point 252.227-7025: that such a direct NDA between the covered public assistance contractor and the owner of proprietary information „implements“ the requirements of clause 252.227-7025, which would require at least the necessary conditions to establish a legally sufficient NDA covering all the restrictions and obligations contained in the clause of 252.227-7025. Beyond these minimum requirements, the parties are also free to mutually agree on additional terms, but neither party can require the other party to accept a condition that is not necessary to implement legal requirements 252.227-7025 (which fully implement the legal requirements). On November 27, 2012, President Obama signed the Protection enhancement of the country Act of 2012. The law strengthens protection for federal employees who reveal evidence of waste, fraud or abuse. The WPEA also requires that any declaration, form or confidentiality agreement (NDA) contain the following statement and provides that NDAs executed without the language may be applied as long as the authorities inform staff of the declaration. . . .